Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, University of Split , Split , Croatia
Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, University of Split , Split , Croatia
Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, University of Split , Split , Croatia
Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, University of Split , Split , Croatia
Due to the very complex composition of leachate wastewater, combining two or more physical, chemical, or biological processes, carried out simultaneously or sequentially, is highly needed in order to obtain effluent suitable for further discharge into sewage. In this paper, electrocoagulation coupled with synthetic zeolite (EC-NaX), electrocoagulation coupled with ultrasound (EC-US), and two steps electrocoagulation (EC-1st and EC-2nd) were tested for compost leachate treatment, with very high initial organic loading and acidic pH. The comparison of each process was done in regard to the following parameters: pH, electrical conductivity and temperature change, removal percentage of chemical oxygen demand (COD), turbidity, total solids change, settling ability, and electrode consumption. Results highlight the EC-NaX as the best option for the treatment of compost leachate, due to the highest removal percentage of COD (51.91%), satisfactory removal percentage of turbidity (97%), good settling abilities, and lowest electrode consumption. However, the final COD values in the effluent are still significantly high for further discharge into sewage systems, thus additional treatment needs to be applied. Also, the final acidic pH, high values of electrical conductivity, and high temperature of effluent need to be solved in further treatment steps.
The results in this paper are funded by institution funds of the Faculty of Chemical Technology University of Split, Croatia.
Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.