One of the new methods of anchoring steel structures is the use of large-scale buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) on the lateral system of this type of structure. This study investigates the behavior of BRBs and compares them with buckling braces. In this study, a two-dimensional frame with four stories and four spans was taken and analyzed in eight different ways, and each in the form of buckling and buckling-restrained braces. The results show that making the braces buckling-restrained has a positive effect on increasing ductility and energy dissipation.
Shamekhi, S., Ansal, A., & Kurtuluş, A. (2023). A Comparison Study Between 1D and 2D Site Response Analyses Based on Observed Earthquake Acceleration Records. In Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering (pp. 393–401). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20172-1_38
Vafaei, D., & Eskandari, R. (2014). Seismic response of mega buckling-restrained braces subjected to fling-step and forward-directivity near-fault ground motions. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 24(9), 672–686. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1205
Malley, J. O. (2007a). The 2005 AISC Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. Engineering Journal, 44(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.62913/engj.v44i1.900
Bai, J., Zhang, J., Jin, S., Du, K., & Wang, Y. (2021). A multi-modal-analysis-based simplified seismic design method for high-rise frame-steel plate shear wall dual structures. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 177, 106484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106484
Abdollahzadeh, M. A., Belur, M. Y., Basoglu, M. F., & Kefal, A. (2023). Shape Sensing of Beam-Like Structures Using the Robust iFEM-iQS4 Inverse Shell Element. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 72, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2023.3309367
Kim, J., & Choi, H. (2005). Response modification factors of chevron-braced frames. Engineering Structures, 27(2), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.10.009
Lam, N., Wilson, J., & Hutchinson, G. (1998). The ductility reduction factor in the seismic design of buildings. 749–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845
Abdollahi, A., Poursha, M., & Abedi, K. (n.d.). Seismic response modification factors of single-layer diamatic dome structures, Engineering.
Abdollahi, A., Poursha, M., & Abedi, K. (2024). Seismic response modification factors of single-layer diamatic dome structures. Engineering Structures, 310, 118091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118091
Naghavi, M., & Malekinejad, M. (2018). A Study of the Behaviour of Steel Moment Frame with Buckling Restrained Bracing. Soil Structure Interaction Journal, 64–70.
Yu, Y. J., Tsai, K. C., Li, C. H., Weng, Y. T., & Tsai, C. Y. (2011). Analytical Simulations for Shaking Table Tests of a Full Scale Buckling Restrained Braced Frame. Procedia Engineering, 14, 2941–2948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.370
Yoshino, T., & Karino, Y. (1971). Experimental study on shear wall with braces: Part 2. In: Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting. Architectural Institute of Japan, Structural Engineering Section, 403–404.
Malley, J. O. (2007b). The 2005 AISC Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. Engineering Journal, 44(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.62913/engj.v44i1.900
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
